apache
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: anyone gotten the 2.0a6 patches to work?

To: Mike Abbott <mja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: anyone gotten the 2.0a6 patches to work?
From: Nick Caruso <ncaruso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:23:54 -0400
Cc: apache@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: dis
References: <200009252257.PAA67927@trudge.engr.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-apache@xxxxxxxxxxx
Mike Abbott wrote:

> > I'm trying to build a version of apache 2.0a6 with the state threads
> > patches.
>
> Cool.

Built it last week, successfully.  Been out sick the last couple of days.

> > I downloaded the state threads code, and unpacked and built it, and sure
> > enough it's got the st.h header...
> >
> > My question is, has anyone already figured out how to point the apache
> > configure/make files at the location where the state threads package is
> > installed?
>
> You need either to install st.h and libst.so into your system's default
> locations (for example, /usr/include and /usr/lib, respectively)

Mr. System Administrator Man frowns disapprovingly and does not give me the
root password.

> or to
> set some environment variables to point to where those files are.  I
> just updated the STM's user's guide to answer this in more detail.  See
>         http://oss.sgi.com/projects/apache/stm.html#guide

I managed, by sticking "-L" and "-I" options in everywhere I could, to
finally bludgeon the thing into compiling.  I may have had to set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment as well.  I was hoping someone knew a way
to trick "configure" into doing all this for me...

I'm trying to do a rough benchmark comparison of Apache 2.0 with your patches
and "Proprietary Web Server X", both running on an 8-processor SGI box.

Any suggestions?  I've been running a bunch of perl scripts on people's
desktop boxes, each doing a fetch of a 40k page of static HTML.  The two
servers look comparable, but 1) the times are all over the place, seeming to
imply that I'm actually measuring overhead from the desktop machines and not
the server response time, and 2) the cpu utilization on the server never
breaks 2 or 3 percent, for either web server.

   thanks and best regards,
       ncc



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>