apache
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: accelerating apache/QSC. (fwd)

To: tcl@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: accelerating apache/QSC. (fwd)
From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:52:59 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: apache@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008081341580.6890-100000@magician.bunzy.net>
Sender: owner-apache@xxxxxxxxxxx
On  8 Aug, tc lewis wrote:

>> > overview, or should i continue reading through the actual patch?
>> 
>> It seems that's the only way... perhaps you can document what you get
>> out of the patch? :-)
> 
> haha.  that thing is large.  seems heavily composed of (long) and other
> casts for 64 bit / irix64 portability i assume, but i haven't found much
> beyond that...yet...

There's more, belive me (I ported it to 1.3.12 on my own, but I wasn't
fast enough to submit it, it was already done... and no, I didn't
remember details).

>> [server-status]
>> You haven't included relevant parts of your apache.conf (I didn't use
>> the QSC, so I can't comment further).
> 
> hmm, there's not much to it.  i basically use sgi's defaults:
> 
> <IfModule mod_mmap_static.c>
>     QSC on
> </IfModule>
> 
> and my configure did include --enable-module=mmap_static
> 
> i've seen the mmapfile directive with mmap_static, but i was under the
> assumption that QSC handles caching much more automatically and

No, you have to use mmapfile.

> dynamically.  if not, what are its benefits?

Static content, e.g. images, downloads, ...

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
                           Reboot America.

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander @ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = 7423 F3E6 3A7E B334 A9CC  B10A 1F5F 130A A638 6E7E


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>