X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p2RDM9wI121650 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:22:09 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1301232316-086a01c40000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E16C837F78E for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id tODTeBMXtDgDKgxB for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2937826iyb.26 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MOeIDS4ypCW7+q5cPTGm2MwIFW4WYEU3UAd20bR2vAE=; b=rDtDnT1MbttXYhA+fy/TQUtE1BVgAQVvsDZrafS+V29zLcGiBJx09+QxtXmWWF4OR8 K6uuoASdI5j8byOovoqS3yV5PXuqBP1fp/qppJe+xd9tZGa6rqLJ15wmEBijqthte7U8 cMq5QQNh/LHRvKkDyjGxhfppAGeuHTocV36iU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=geiRou4vg+VAkCKJfAPOX7PEiQdp6nipNePaCXXXBWTba/Ama6aE1TIYcQc2G5ZyFl zdBv2HrI10nfYLGyWR03PCcGZSOuQfEW6f549uLrcGx8keNlv0WoQJ+b1O617oI2gCqv rb4EO8LM3S+fX3IXA9x/dCiWFSGRzu7aIkkiU= Received: by 10.231.113.86 with SMTP id z22mr3061822ibp.93.1301232315885; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 06:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (97-122-93-127.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.93.127]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y10sm2190479iba.46.2011.03.27.06.25.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 27 Mar 2011 06:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8F3AB8.4050803@timsesow.com> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:25:12 -0600 From: Timothy Sesow Reply-To: tim@timsesow.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: No space left on device on xfs filesystem with 7.7TB free Subject: Re: No space left on device on xfs filesystem with 7.7TB free References: <4D8E0774.1070200@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4D8E0774.1070200@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-iy0-f181.google.com[209.85.210.181] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1301232316 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1.42 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1.42 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED, MARKETING_SUBJECT X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.59121 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.60 MARKETING_SUBJECT Subject contains popular marketing words -0.00 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature passes verification 0.00 DKIM_SIGNED Domain Keys Identified Mail: message has a signature X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean I had the same problem recently and couldn't go to inode64, so I put a writeup at http://osvault.blogspot.com/2011/03/fixing-1tbyte-inode-problem-in-xfs-file.html on what I did to find the files in the lower allocation groups and move them. On 03/26/2011 09:34 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/26/11 8:41 AM, atyu30 atyu30 wrote: >> >> I'm running RedHat Linux Enterprise Server 5.2, on a 64-bit x86_64 >> Linux machine with kernel version 2.6.18-128.el5 smp. I appear to >> have version 2.9.4 of xfsprogs. > Just as point of reference, if you're using the xfs-kmod, that is > extremely old, un-updated, and unsupported at this point. > >> I have a 22TB xfs filesystem ,Yesterday, the hard disk is full, today >> released a 7.7T disk space.But still can not write to new file. > You have probably run out of 32-bit inode space on your 27T filesystem. > >> software ambience: >> >> [root@Production data5]# uname -a Linux Production 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 >> SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> [root@Production data5]# rpm -qa | grep xfs >> xfsprogs-2.9.4-1.el5.centos xorg-x11-xfs-1.0.2-4 kmod-xfs-0.4-2 >> > that's X11, not the filesystem, for what it's worth :) > >> problem: >> >> [root@Production data5]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail >> Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 48G 6.7G 39G 15% / >> /dev/sda2 81G 4.0G 73G 6% /opt /dev/sdb1 >> 22T 15T 7.7T 65% /data2 tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G >> 0% /dev/shm >> >> [root@Production data5]# df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed >> IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/sda1 12812288 136847 12675441 >> 2% / /dev/sda2 21867648 8440 21859208 1% /opt >> /dev/sdb1 23429382016 4625792 23424756224 1% /data2 >> tmpfs 504701 1 504700 1% /dev/shm >> >> [root@Production data5]# touch test.log touch: cannot touch >> `test.log': No space left on device > If your applications can handle> 32-bit inode numbers, mount -o inode64 > and see if you can create the new file. > > hm, we should maybe printk in this case, it comes up often enough. > > -Eric >> >> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list >> xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs >