X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p18JvZal145695 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:57:35 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1297195208-0865022d0000-w1Z2WR X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mout.perfora.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1ADB2FD27EA for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id el7wl7sc9xL1Nl2R for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.10.205] (24-176-21-160.dhcp.klmz.mi.charter.com [24.176.21.160]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MU0ZF-1PdrJt4C5R-00RTOX; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:00:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4D51A0BC.6070201@lueckdatasystems.com> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:59:56 -0500 From: Michael Lueck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20101008 Firefox/4.0b7pre SeaMonkey/2.1b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner CC: Bill Kendall , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dann Frazier X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26? Subject: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26? References: <4D49A35B.6030009@sgi.com> <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> <4D4ABEF7.7000400@lueckdatasystems.com> <20110204000823.GW11040@dastard> <4D517FD2.5040509@lueckdatasystems.com> <20110208195256.GA25601@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20110208195256.GA25601@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:OnfX9sMMjjBzNv6vG3fwHivm/qd0gytfnj5N9n9xgqZ qsfDW4W5IEFk2aWn7RnFKRSTDQbTryHGS09JAuO5wfzSgH60ng 2W8aRsih63koWONlDprvvuVRCmhv5LEYZzElahEVDMUfV1/SAr CaMxg84gMCM+5Qn6nCNrkzES7DUs+LJcMlknvgJIPKkOhmSSJX Sys+Cqd8m1JBKsSYnnq8xmvsm9CyfksdxgvOF5trQI= X-Barracuda-Connect: mout.perfora.net[74.208.4.195] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1297195209 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.54764 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Dave Chinner wrote: > The man pages, perhaps? i.e. 'man xfs_db' and 'man xfs_repair' I did, and oddly enough I did not find "" in the example syntax... > Substitute /dev/sda, /dev/sdb or whatever your filesystem is on for > "" in the above commands. aaaahhh, THAT explains the curve ball. ;-) I will IPL the server to the latest kernel and run the tests immediately. Thank you so much for the explanation! Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/