X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p14EAbea019863 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:10:37 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1296828787-7ff4001f0000-w1Z2WR X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mout.perfora.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8156B1DC6F2C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 06:13:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CqBWgbSl4IpZd0mg for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:13:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.10.205] (24-176-21-160.dhcp.klmz.mi.charter.com [24.176.21.160]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MXILt-1PgG712gr7-00WzfG; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:12:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4D4C0965.9010905@lueckdatasystems.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:12:53 -0500 From: Michael Lueck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20101008 Firefox/4.0b7pre SeaMonkey/2.1b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner CC: Bill Kendall , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dann Frazier X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26? Subject: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26? References: <4D49A35B.6030009@sgi.com> <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> <4D4ABEF7.7000400@lueckdatasystems.com> <20110204000823.GW11040@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20110204000823.GW11040@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:+E/gjmf9eCrYo2cP6/fQiVny0/d560W6b9cgg+fS0PK 0C4/DE0Pp8uDoew/nBqhuPtpf++q054g2CN+cDnW444sO0jQfZ CoeJKzZwN0DJTbE5JlZwBSi0F12Q6yORMSPYLB7ocGB/XH3Zl/ NJb1lvGF9wTxjJOWml/rRYol94RjDnATm1E8G/bIN7ATX98Wsw 66wTGQbeobdV8SqU3k+TBJZ5g0Uaw7v7sne91Zx7Ak= X-Barracuda-Connect: mout.perfora.net[74.208.4.195] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1296828787 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.54358 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Dave Chinner wrote: > Ok, so xfsdump i seeing a short bulkstat, then an EINVAL returned > from the next bulkstat. That's not a race condition, and makes me > think you have some kind of on-disk corruption. Very odd that some kind of on-disk corruption is suddenly causing xfsdump problems starting with Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) kernel 2.6.32-27 and persisting in 2.6.32-28. And there is one other person who confirmed this xfsdump problem running Lucid with kernel 2.6.32-28. They reported their "me too" in the Ubuntu bug tracker. Could it be that 2.6.32-26 and prior managed to write something to disk corrupted, and the newer code is tripping on it? I shall reboot the server to the 2.6.32-28 kernel and perform the tests you requested. Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/