Message-ID: <4B72D3F3.2040308@news-service.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:42:43 +0100
From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31	xfs_fs_destroy_inode:
 cannot reclaim)
References: <4B3F9F88.9030307@news-service.com> <20100107110446.GA13802@discord.disaster> <4B45CFAC.4000607@news-service.com> <20100108113114.GA8654@discord.disaster> <4B504B03.7050604@news-service.com> <4B6706CE.1020207@news-service.com> <20100208194226.GD9527@infradead.org> <4B712166.9010701@news-service.com> <20100209103157.GA5197@infradead.org> <4B72A9D1.8030101@news-service.com> <20100210145508.GA29047@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100210145508.GA29047@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10-2-2010 15:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:42:57PM +0100, Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch. After having this patch applied we saw *a lot*
>> warnings. They all look like this:
>
> Ok, looks like that is not an issue, so you can discard that patch.
>
> I went down to the radix tree code to look for races in it's tag
> handling, but then noticed that we might have an issue with our
> usage of the radix-tree API.  Can you try the patch below ontop
> of Dave's rollup, and instead of my previous one?

Okay. This patch is currently active. Thanks. I don't have a way to 
trigger it, so we'll have to wait and see what happens.

Obviously we'll keep you posted.

Have any of these patches been sent to the stable team? And have these 
patches been submitted to the upcoming 2.6.33 kernel?

-Patrick