X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9PMZQbc164386 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:35:26 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1256510221-439201ad0000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 30573C53054 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CC8gwynljdE60x91 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id CA99A54C5B0; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:49 +1100 (EST) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id NWk58dMWE5twR5c9; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:49 +1100 (EST) Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (gatekeeper.yarra.acx [192.168.102.10]) by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201A8A502BF; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:35:20 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6968EC7C77; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:49 +1100 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gatekeeper.yarra.acx Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5eqBTw+I3cq; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:45 +1100 (EST) Received: from mail-au.aconex.com (mail-au.aconex.com [192.168.102.12]) by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453CFC7C38; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:45 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:45 +1100 (EST) From: Nathan Scott To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <396549975.11101256510205184.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <20091025074715.GC9482@infradead.org> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: simplify and unify source package generation Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: simplify and unify source package generation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [203.89.192.141] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.18_GA_3011.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - [unknown] (Linux)/5.0.18_GA_3011.RHEL5_64) X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.aconex.com[203.89.202.182] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1256510223 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.12837 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Status: Clean ----- "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:49:51AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > >From looking through the patch it seems OK to me. I haven't had a > chance > > to test it out yet, though - but from just eyeballing it, and if > noone > > pipes up complaining about the auto-rpm-build removal (I don't > expect > > they will, at this stage of xfsprogs life) it all looks good and > correct. > > Thanks. Does this count as a reviewed-by? Yep, sorry - Reviewed-by: Nathan Scott > Btw, one other thing I'm pondering is removing the automatic call to > ./configure from make if it's not configured yet. It causes lots of > pain for the toplevel makefile and the makefile snipplets in > include/. > We'd have to replace the .deb building makefile snipplet with a > build-debs.sh shell script, but that might be cleaner anyway. Its not so bad IMO & we seem to be getting into the realm of gratuitous change, but - *shrug* - doesn't make much difference I guess, I'm sure people will figure it out pretty quickly. cheers. -- Nathan