X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n5UKgQUC228876 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:42:27 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1246394577-3295029a0000-w1Z2WR X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 13B35333CB3 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RzXuFoXmpgTNjXGi for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:42:57 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MLkAK-0001Nn-5j; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:42:56 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:42:56 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Patrick Schreurs Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Lachlan McIlroy , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Tommy van Leeuwen , Eric Sandeen X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode Subject: Re: 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode Message-ID: <20090630204256.GA1891@infradead.org> References: <4A408316.2070903@news-service.com> <1587994907.388291245745033392.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <20090623171305.GB23971@infradead.org> <4A4A7205.6010101@news-service.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A4A7205.6010101@news-service.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Barracuda-Connect: bombadil.infradead.org[18.85.46.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1246394578 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13:57PM +0200, Patrick Schreurs wrote: > Hi (again), > > Anyone has any advice to prevent this from happening? We've seen 10 > crashes in the last 14 days. Would it be helpful to enable > CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG? Does this result in a big performance hit on busy xfs > filesystems? If we can help troubleshoot this problem, please advice. > > If i understand correctly this issue also exists in 2.6.29? Should i > downgrade to the latest 2.6.28 kernel to regain stability? For now please downgrade to the latest 2.6.28, yes. I hope I will have time and machine ressources to dig deeper into the problem this week.