X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9TLj5Qx025806 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:45:05 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1225316705-1c8700e20000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2C04E55B796 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Ws7yB6UdabWHCZpN for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:45:05 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KvIqd-0002kY-Iv; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:45:03 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:45:03 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christoph Hellwig , Nick Piggin , akpm@linux-foundation.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) Message-ID: <20081029214503.GA8895@infradead.org> References: <20081028144715.683011000@suse.de> <20081028153953.GB3082@wotan.suse.de> <20081028222746.GB4985@disturbed> <20081029001653.GF15599@wotan.suse.de> <20081029031645.GE4985@disturbed> <20081029032601.GF4985@disturbed> <20081029091326.GB32545@infradead.org> <20081029214202.GH17077@disturbed> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081029214202.GH17077@disturbed> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Barracuda-Connect: bombadil.infradead.org[18.85.46.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1225316706 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:42:02AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I'll do that as a separate patch - it's not really part of a "fix > error value inversion" bug fix.... Well it is kindof. Because we'd call Linux library functions directly from the method we skip to places that need sign conversion and could possibly go wrong. But if you want a separate patch that's fine with me too.