Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:02:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_43, MIME_8BIT_HEADER,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m7MA2Kcu007261 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:02:20 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1219399421-596a030b0000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 29BA21A2CEEC for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6fHuzWFH9CffDC9O for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 26so369020wfd.32 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=wG31hPA5iXNIR8BhjHdme+DErcBwC9Zy+ltYhdZFsCU=; b=PTsJPxR3bUTm/gjNoGGbzcWFc387BqmffRSlfHJjHxQxvEd1vcxeZkZ2hrc8rwdHVk G9moJVx7m/Gos2pASP/Q3mLHMb9qBbipLeYlDe9yykle+t5liGays1HdtLHlNRRIt8p/ 8FJAO6Y5/mEActTZX0VuM2bCJM+ZUR7h+UESU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=PONG0GX+FzqZjvUG6Xx3VwIVwgEPtjyI66b7zfmpk4HI0GfgH8xsZk/04ppEcNc+7T AoyYjoteSPMNV+8qjGLBsNm6jqdIIpTnk0Tf5dtoheaGyARVh7I8VYlZR9rduvR1wWh5 dSY3fuXrAGi0UKZPKJ1NH3sj0wyIo0feO5m1A= Received: by 10.142.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr339947wfd.114.1219399420681; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.112.10 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50ed5c760808220303p37e03e8dge5b868a572374e0b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:03:40 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?S=B3awomir_Nowakowski?=" To: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: XFS issue under 2.6.25.13 kernel Subject: XFS issue under 2.6.25.13 kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Barracuda-Connect: wf-out-1314.google.com[209.85.200.174] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1219399422 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.3379 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/8071/Fri Aug 22 00:53:11 2008 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 17675 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nailman23@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Dear All, We have a problem with implementing xfs file system for Linux. The problem appears after mounting xfs file system on 2.6.25.13 kernel that is created on 2.6.17.13 kernel. File system is created on logical volume in the following way: lvcreate -L 4G volume1 -n test mkfs.xfs /dev/volume1/test mount /dev/volume1/test /mnt/x After mounting it on 2.6.17.13 kernel "df -B 1" output looks like this: /dev/volume1/test 4284481536 147456 4284334080 1% /mnt/x but in case of 2.6.25.13 kernel: /dev/volume1/test 4284481536 4489216 4279992320 1% /mnt/x The same happens in case of 2.6.26.3 kernel. As it is shown after mounting the volume in newer kernel size of file system is visible smaller. The problem appears when on this volume exists one big file, occupying all available space. After trying to mount it under newer kernel, the file is cut because available free space is smaller. Is it known issue and/or does solution or workaround exists? Thank you in advance for your help. Best Regards Roland