Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:00:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m814xxbU026918 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:00:04 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1220245245-2d0603730000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 29BDB73C169; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5wXGCgauBtEaksrf; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ka1Wv-0000kS-BV; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:00:45 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 01:00:45 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Barry Naujok Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [REVIEW #2] Update kernel code to compile in userspace (libxfs) Subject: Re: [REVIEW #2] Update kernel code to compile in userspace (libxfs) Message-ID: <20080901050045.GA1396@infradead.org> References: <20080829181120.GA9455@infradead.org> <20080901015950.GA16825@infradead.org> <20080901020826.GA31724@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Barracuda-Connect: bombadil.infradead.org[18.85.46.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1220245282 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.4310 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/8122/Sat Aug 30 18:04:56 2008 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 17773 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: hch@infradead.org Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs > --- 2.6.x-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h > +++ 2.6.x-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h > @@ -192,15 +192,16 @@ typedef struct xfs_perag > xfs_agino_t pagi_freecount; /* number of free inodes */ > xfs_agino_t pagi_count; /* number of allocated inodes */ > int pagb_count; /* pagb slots in use */ > + xfs_perag_busy_t *pagb_list; /* unstable blocks */ > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > spinlock_t pagb_lock; /* lock for pagb_list */ > -#endif > - xfs_perag_busy_t *pagb_list; /* unstable blocks */ > + Inside structures we should be more careful about reordering, but this one looks fine becaus pagb_list and pagb_lock should be in the same cache line either way. The rest looks good, too.