Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:54:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6N5sBjA027112 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:54:11 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1216792520-35f1034b0000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6B159E89698 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.189]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1nqdPewWDXusNz9N for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y6so1229602tia.18 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=s9ucrwxK9HushamQjphVNJg09KDbWQHgNYjzErqJwtI=; b=FcxmctC7z89Uxm5ZcrGsc2T+T0ItolEo/zBcIbltQmuxseQ4CNZv/MGxhMNN72RxEb toKWUJv3rH7efeudSXT/bnaaPbLg8XcPhvPs56x3bAivhEh9yFbI74dEWQuPqBIPJ4O6 9QMqt52hAOSweGHKqHjFPMtJC4La1iQ594p4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dk1DJjJ42dTHtO/jVtZZRxPLTYmjsl78cUtxAwRw09BzxUHjOSPlU/WwPQx3LsXXQk PQ+e6wJj4HEXbmUB5C/rkSPc1OHrHLUfOjzHv382jUfCApvdoHG+5YxxXe+N6GKwe/la Vj0kpI2DbkM5arzWFG6kuHZWUNyxcBoQkcgxY= Received: by 10.110.28.15 with SMTP id b15mr5428673tib.26.1216792519240; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.40.13 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:25:19 +0530 From: "Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi" To: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Is it a bug ?? Subject: Is it a bug ?? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: ti-out-0910.google.com[209.85.142.189] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1216792521 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.56821 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6021/Wed Feb 27 15:55:48 2008 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 2586 X-archive-position: 17045 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: tharindunix@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Dear XFS Gurus, I am using "Linux tintin 2.6.25-gentoo-r6 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jul 13 10:50:58 IST 2008 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux While working I got I/O error and file system has been shutdown. I had to run xfs_repair and now file system is working fine. This happened several time until i repair the file system. Is this a bug or due to hardware failure .....?? I do not know given info is enough to isolate anything, but i am happy to provide more info if you need. Cheers Tharindu [ 37.074883] br0: port 2(qtap1) entering forwarding state [ 57.179699] Filesystem "sda3": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffff80352b66 [ 57.179699] Pid: 3757, comm: gconfd-2 Tainted: P 2.6.25-tintin #2 [ 57.179699] [ 57.179699] Call Trace: [ 57.179699] [] xfs_error_report+0x3c/0x3e [ 57.179699] [] ? xfs_create+0x3f3/0x477 [ 57.179699] [] xfs_trans_cancel+0x65/0x102 [ 57.179699] [] xfs_create+0x3f3/0x477 [ 57.179699] [] xfs_vn_mknod+0x165/0x266 [ 57.179699] [] xfs_vn_create+0xb/0xd [ 57.179699] [] vfs_create+0x8d/0x102 [ 57.179699] [] open_namei+0x1ae/0x6a0 [ 57.179699] [] ? __lookup_hash+0x55/0x11e [ 57.179699] [] do_filp_open+0x28/0x4b [ 57.179699] [] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x113/0x121 [ 57.179699] [] do_sys_open+0x51/0xd2 [ 57.179699] [] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d [ 57.179699] [] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80 [ 57.179699] [ 57.179699] xfs_force_shutdown(sda3,0x8) called from line 1164 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Return address = 0xffffffff8034cae5 [ 57.192307] Filesystem "sda3": Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem: sda3 [ 57.192307] Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s) [ 134.906667] xfs_force_shutdown(sda3,0x1) called from line 420 of file fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xffffffff80355722 [ 155.042525] XFS mounting filesystem sda3 [ 155.050723] Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sda3 (logdev: internal) [ 155.365958] Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: sda3 (logdev: internal) [ 261.328960] XFS mounting filesystem sda3 [ 261.413972] Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda3 -- Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi In the end, It is the life in my years. [[HTML alternate version deleted]]