Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4IDKcRc032372 for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:40 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1211116887-6427014d0000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 14D947902A1 for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id O8364EZOnIWew2YQ for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JxipL-0006OX-HC; Sun, 18 May 2008 13:21:27 +0000 Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't Subject: Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't Message-ID: <20080518132127.GA19006@infradead.org> References: <20080516222755.3e557c00@galadriel.home> <20080518131855.GA1383@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080518131855.GA1383@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Barracuda-Connect: bombadil.infradead.org[18.85.46.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1211116888 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.50716 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6021/Wed Feb 27 15:55:48 2008 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 15976 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: hch@infradead.org Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:18:55AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The only significant thing I see is that the FS is really close to 16 > > TB of allocated data (15.7TB). I tried mounting it with "inode64" > > option with no more loving. > > Did you remount it with that option as in mount -o remount or did you > completely unmount it and mount it again? Unfortunately none of the > xfs-specific mount options can be reset with remount yet, and it doesn't > return an error either (both are added to my todo list now) Oh, and please post the output of /proc/self/mounts to see if all expected mount options are actualy seen by the filesystem.