Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:42:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m3K7gAoJ032575 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:42:13 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1208677371-6e50015b0000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp5.pp.htv.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D7B5D1596D23 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp5.pp.htv.fi (smtp5.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.39]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id tdB9Dm9v1g59D6fX for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs181133002.pp.htv.fi (cs181133002.pp.htv.fi [82.181.133.2]) by smtp5.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2E75BC00C; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:42:50 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:42:28 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Oliver Pinter , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: x86: 4kstacks default Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default Message-ID: <20080420074228.GE1595@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <200804181737.m3IHbabI010051@hera.kernel.org> <20080418142934.38ce6bf4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419142329.GA5339@elte.hu> <6101e8c40804190735g17f1e0bj25c2bc0e2a6eac26@mail.gmail.com> <20080419151911.GB1595@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <480AA2B9.10305@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <480AA2B9.10305@sandeen.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp5.pp.htv.fi[213.243.153.39] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1208677371 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.48294 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6021/Wed Feb 27 15:55:48 2008 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 15475 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: bunk@kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:56:09PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:35:31PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: > >> ... > >> with the older kernel is typical: xfs+nfs+4k stack(+lvm) > > > > Does anyone still experience problems with 2.6.25? > > There are always problems. You can always come up with something that > will crash in 4k, IMHO. We are going from 6k to 4k. Your "You can always come up with something that will crash in" point would be invariant to this change (although it might be harder to trigger in real life). > Rather than foisting this upon everyone, I'd rather see work put into > making stack size a boot parameter or something, so that people can > choose what's appropriate for their workload (or their IO stack, if you > prefer). Why should users have to poke with such deeply internal things? That doesn't sound right. Excessive stack usage in the kernel is considered to be a bug. We should identify and fix all remaining problems (if any). > -Eric cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed