Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:31:26 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from lucidpixels.com (lucidpixels.com [75.144.35.66]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id lAIFVJPt014723 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:31:20 -0800 Received: by lucidpixels.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E2C541C000263; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:31:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lucidpixels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19DF4019345; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:31:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:31:26 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34.internal.lan To: Christian Kujau cc: Chris Wedgwood , Trond Myklebust , LKML , "J. Bruce Fields" , Benny Halevy , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20071114070400.GA25708@puku.stupidest.org> <473AA72C.6020308@panasas.com> <20071114125907.GB4010@fieldses.org> <20071116003410.GA16797@puku.stupidest.org> <59468.62.180.231.196.1195204637.squirrel@housecafe.dyndns.org> <20071116110315.GA27969@puku.stupidest.org> <1195222772.7653.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20071116214327.GA9685@puku.stupidest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4832/Sat Nov 17 17:07:36 2007 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 13693 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote: >> Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not >> saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer >> short-term workaround. > > I've opened http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9400 to track this one > (and to not forget about it :)). > > I wonder why so few people are seeing this, I'd have assumed that > NFSv3 && XFS is not sooo exotic... Still on 2.6.23.x here (also use nfsv3 + xfs). > > Christian. > -- > BOFH excuse #273: > > The cord jumped over and hit the power switch. > >