Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 05 May 2007 13:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.210]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l45KZSfB010426 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:29 -0700 Received: (qmail 92356 invoked from network); 5 May 2007 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stupidest.org) (cwedgwood@sbcglobal.net@24.5.75.45 with login) by smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 May 2007 20:35:27 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: NfkFI3wVM1l2KAzcA7Gpvf5kMfsvZM8GGJA_DL2tvbfn03E9cLQ8rwaGzn2fNG.7uUhguDxBvQ-- Received: by tuatara.stupidest.org (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 887111827261; Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:25 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Emmanuel Florac , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS crash on linux raid Message-ID: <20070505203525.GA16477@tuatara.stupidest.org> References: <20070503164521.16efe075@harpe.intellique.com> <20070504005922.GC32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504090613.7c0f97d3@galadriel.home> <20070504073344.GL32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504152546.614374ac@harpe.intellique.com> <463B4962.70904@sandeen.net> <20070504173049.14606033@harpe.intellique.com> <20070504232028.GA19744@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20070505171931.6fe9b6f5@galadriel.home> <463CB5C4.7040803@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <463CB5C4.7040803@sandeen.net> X-archive-position: 11291 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: cw@f00f.org Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:50:12AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > There are also stack debugging config options; one that will warn if > you are about to overflow (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW) and one that > will print max stack depth in sysrq-t output > (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE). I was in such a hurry I don't think I tweaked that sanely. I'll go over the patch checking that and test it later today. Is there some preferred kernel version people would like?