Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:29:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from cfa.harvard.edu (cfa.harvard.edu [131.142.10.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBMNTTqw016819 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:29:30 -0800 Received: from titan (titan [131.142.24.40]) by cfa.harvard.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/cfunix Mast-Sol 1.0) with ESMTP id kBMNSclh004212; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:28:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:28:38 -0500 (EST) From: Gaspar Bakos Reply-To: gbakos@cfa.harvard.edu To: Eric Sandeen cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: unexpected XFS SB magic number In-Reply-To: <458C6719.6080106@sandeen.net> Message-ID: References: <458C6719.6080106@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 10110 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: gbakos@cfa.harvard.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Content-Length: 738 Lines: 31 Hi, Eric, RE: > > xfs_check: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x45464920 > That spells "EFI" Does this have any special meaning? E.g. I could figure out who labelled the disk (array)? > looks like somebody came along & labeled your disk for you. Dangers of > being on a san I suppose (if you are....) Humm. This is an FC5 with SMP opteron. The RAID-5 (12 disks) is ran by an ARECA 1130-ML card. > repair might fix it.... I worry that what repair will leave behind is pure numbers (and many of those), like 11212/ 12133/ 121212/ ... and to reconstruct ~3Tb from that is not trivial... This reminds me: what paranoid safety measures can one take? E.g keep an external log of the filesystem as well? Thanks for the thoughts! Gaspar