Message-ID: <4558AFC9.3010009@falconstor.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:47:53 -0500
From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com>
Reply-To: geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com
Organization: FalconStor Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
CC: James Pearson <james-p@moving-picture.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Update for the RHEL4 XFS module?
References: <455893BE.4010208@moving-picture.com> <45589A06.7040503@sandeen.net> <4558AE11.2030108@falconstor.com> <4558AEFE.10108@sandeen.net>
In-Reply-To: <4558AEFE.10108@sandeen.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1075
Lines: 31

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> James Pearson wrote:
>>>> The RHEL4 XFS module code at 
>>>> <ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL4/> is now about a year old.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any chance that it could be updated with something based on 
>>>> more recent code?
>>>>
>>> Funny you should ask, I just started looking at this last night :)
>>>
>>> It was originally based on the SLES9 xfs code; my plan is to simply 
>>> update it to the latest sles9 xfs codebase, as that has been tended to 
>>> with a goal of stability by the fine folks at sgi....  so, no 
>>> bleeding-edge xfs for now (I don't particularly want to backport 2.6.18 
>>> xfs code to 2.6.9....)
>>>
>> Eric, please notify us via the list when it has been updated.
>> I would like this module updated too...
> 
> Will do.  Are there particular issues you're having, or is your code
> just feeling a bit old in general.  ;-)

No particular issue in my case, but there tend to be some bug fixes in 
any given 12-month time-span... ;-)

-- 

Geir A. Myrestrand