Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k6K7E0DW008069 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:14:12 -0700 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA24219; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:13:21 +1000 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id k6K7DHgw1975966; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:13:17 +1000 (EST) Received: (from nathans@localhost) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id k6K7DAM11977042; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:13:10 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:13:10 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: Kasper Sandberg , Justin Piszcz , Torsten Landschoff Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Message-ID: <20060720171310.B1970528@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost>; from lkml@metanurb.dk on Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:21:08PM +0200 X-archive-position: 8328 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nathans@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Content-Length: 840 Lines: 27 On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:21:08PM +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 08:57 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:29:41AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > > > > > Jul 17 07:33:53 pulsar kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216 > > > Jul 17 07:33:53 pulsar kernel: dir: inode 54526538 > > > > I suspect you had some residual directory corruption from using the > > 2.6.17 XFS (which is known to have a lurking dir2 corruption issue, > > fixed in the latest -stable point release). Correction there - no -stable exists with this yet, I guess that'll be 2.6.17.7 once its out though. > what action do you suggest i do now? I've captured the state of this issue here, with options and ways to correct the problem: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 Hope this helps. cheers. -- Nathan