Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k6JN1nDW008261 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:02:00 -0700 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA15050; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:01:17 +1000 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id k6JN1Dgw1966121; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:01:14 +1000 (EST) Received: (from nathans@localhost) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id k6JN19uO1967055; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:01:09 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:01:09 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: "Jeffrey E. Hundstad" Cc: Mattias Hedenskog , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Message-ID: <20060720090109.F1947140@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <67dc30140607190717r57ed2fe5w719dcca896110d8@mail.gmail.com> <44BE48D5.7020107@mnsu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <44BE48D5.7020107@mnsu.edu>; from jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu on Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:59:33AM -0500 X-archive-position: 8318 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nathans@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Content-Length: 446 Lines: 14 On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:59:33AM -0500, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: > I did try the xfs_repair 2.8.4 for a volume running on 2.6.17.4 and it > annihilated the volume. This volume was not showing signs of crashing. > So... I guess I would certainly not run xfs_repair unless there is good > reason. Erm, wha..? Can you expand on "annihilated" a bit? (please send me the full xfs_repair output if you still have it). thanks. -- Nathan