Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flyingAngel.upjs.sk (gate.rudna.net [195.122.192.66])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j8AJDKiL019877
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:13:20 -0700
Received: by flyingAngel.upjs.sk (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id A98021004A0; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by flyingAngel.upjs.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AF6180122;
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Derfinak <ja@mail.upjs.sk>
X-X-Sender: ja@alienAngel.home.sk
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sgi.com>
Cc: evilninja <evilninja@gmx.net>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.
In-Reply-To: <43220456.80304@sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509102109080.8548@alienAngel.home.sk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk>
 <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk>
 <43220456.80304@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 6109
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: ja@mail.upjs.sk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-xfs
Content-Length: 396
Lines: 15

On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Jan Derfinak wrote:
> > Do you realy think that memory break on two different machines just after
> > switch to 2.6.13 kernel? But ok I will do it this night.
> 
> You're right, these messages don't often indicate bad memory.  Worth ruling
> out though, I suppose, if you have the time.

Memory is OK. Overnight memtest ended without errors.

jan

--