Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dy.hu (ns.dynamicweb.hu [195.228.155.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j78EqhH9002272 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 07:52:46 -0700 Received: from LocalHost (3e44b3e9.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.179.233]) by dy.hu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id j78EsUiM021558 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:54:30 +0200 From: djani22@dynamicweb.hu Message-ID: <014d01c59c28$744dae40$0400a8c0@LocalHost> To: Subject: Fw: XFS repair problem. Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:49:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-archive-position: 5748 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: djani22@dynamicweb.hu Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Status: O Content-Length: 3548 Lines: 140 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "evilninja" Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 3:55 PM Subject: Re: XFS repair problem. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "evilninja" > To: > Cc: > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:09 PM > Subject: Re: XFS repair problem. > > > > djani22@dynamicweb.hu schrieb: > > > Hello all! > > > > > > I have a "big" filesystem (8TB), and a BIG problem! > > > I can't fix it! > > > > > > [root@dy-base xfsprogs-2.5.6]# xfs_check /dev/md31 > > -------------------------^ > > > > please use current version of xfsprogs: > > > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/cmd_tars/xfsprogs-2.6.36.src.tar.gz > > OK, I try it! > > > > > > xfs_check: out of memory > > > [root@dy-base xfsprogs-2.5.6]# free > > > total used free shared buffers > cached > > > Mem: 4149468 4015820 133648 0 16 > 3718360 > > > -/+ buffers/cache: 297444 3852024 > > > Swap: 0 0 0 > > > > does it help, if you enable some swapspace? > > I can't. > No raw disks in this system. > Only the swap over the network is the possible way, but I dont think so.... > > > > > > But, in this time, the xfs_repair is fails ALWAYS too! > > > I have tryed it 23 times! > > > > > > The different results: > > > > > > 1. Simple segfault. > > > > did you check for bad memory? an overnight run of memtest86+ could tell... > > No, but this is a 14 day system, and before I start it, I have tested it, > witth this test. :-) > > In the system is 4GB DDR2 -ECC ram. > I don't think, it is the problem.... :-) > > And additionaly, only the xfs_repair generate segfaults... > > > > > > > The data on fs and the service is VERY important for me. > > > > hm, how did you *backup* 8TB of data anyway? > > Yes, you have right! > I don't use backup. > > This is a free web storage. > The service is more importanat, than data... :-/ > But I dont want to loose ~3000 webpages.... > > > > > > Dual xeon, 4G ram. > > > The xfs is on RAID 0, 32k chunks > > > > any chance you can run top(1) next to xfs_repair to see how many memory is > > used? > > Max 945MB > top line: > 17595 root 18 0 945M 941M 764 R 31.4 23.2 0:44 3 xfs_repair > > The new version: > > 1. time > > Phase 6 - check inode connectivity... > - resetting contents of realtime bitmap and summary inodes > - ensuring existence of lost+found directory > - traversing filesystem starting at / ... > - traversal finished ... > - traversing all unattached subtrees ... > rebuilding directory inode 4211081386 > xfs_repair: phase6.c:2603: longform_dir2_rebuild_finish: Assertion `error == > 0' failed. > > 2-3-4-5 times the end of log is the same: > rebuilding directory inode 4211081386 > xfs_repair: phase6.c:2603: longform_dir2_rebuild_finish: Assertion `error == > 0'failed. > > No segfault in this version. > > But the xfs_check's problem still here.... > [root@dy-base /]# /usr/local/bin/xfs_check /dev/md31 > xfs_check: out of memory > top: > Mem: 4149468k av, 192640k used, 3956828k free, 0k shrd, 0k > buff > 74608k active, 64068k inactive > Swap: 0k av, 0k used, 0k free 127160k > cached > > > How can I siply delete that inode? (4211081386) > > Thanks for all help! > > > > > thanks, > > Christian. > > -- > > BOFH excuse #194: > > > > We only support a 1200 bps connection. >