Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 01:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net (smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net [212.100.160.76]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i5P8algi012032 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 01:36:50 -0700 Received: from bidibule.office.be.easynet.net ([212.100.163.150] helo=bidibule) by smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BdmCQ-00085X-Cu; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:36:42 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=be.easynet.net ident=rb) by bidibule with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BdmCH-00024h-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:36:33 +0200 Message-ID: <40DBE411.60506@be.easynet.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:36:33 +0200 From: Raphael Bauduin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: evilninja CC: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS partition problem References: <40DAE337.1010109@be.easynet.net> <40DB1969.5020807@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <40DB1969.5020807@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 3525 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: raphael.bauduin@be.easynet.net Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 2033 Lines: 70 evilninja wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Raphael Bauduin schrieb: > >>>From what I read on the web, this could be due to a suboptimal cable, >> >>but could it be the cause of the XFS problems? I don't get these > > > could you use a better cable and see, if the PCI errors go away? > also check earlier logs again, *maybe* the PCI errors appeared way > before the fs took note. > If I have the possibility I'll do it. But those PCI errors only once per boot. When it's running I don't get any of these errors. That seems to indicate that the driver has adapted its working to the controller, and that it's doing fine afterwards. I've looked at older logs and those messages appeared at a boot of 3 december, also followed by this: Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel: Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sd(8,38) (dev: 8/38) Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel: Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: sd(8,38) (dev: 8/38) What's the exact meaning of these messages? Does it mean the partition was not cleanly unmounted? If the partition is not cleanly unmounted at each boot, could it result in a partition error like I had? > >>- the kernel upgrade? > > > do you have "working kernels" left? are they running still fine? > Once the problem occured with the 2.4.26, it also accured when booting in 2.4.20 Thanks. Raph PS: I Think I followed the procedure to subscribe, but I don't get any mails of the mailing list. If you answer, please send it to me directly also. > >>- xfs only? > > > if you have spare diskspace you could try other filesystems and see, if > the errors are the same. but first i'd really care about these PCI errors... > > Christian. > - -- > BOFH excuse #30: > > positron router malfunction > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFA2xlpC/PVm5+NVoYRAkqSAJ99wAiE7OYCJ8sq0TU0Jzl457TfhACeKNQs > /6RsrDufgMQNnHlLNVyh7Kc= > =nmCB > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >