Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 10 May 2004 03:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zok.sgi.com (mtvcafw.sgi.com [192.48.171.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i4AAATKO012816 for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 03:10:29 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with SMTP id i4AA8xhv029185 for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 03:08:59 -0700 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id UAA07055; Mon, 10 May 2004 20:08:56 +1000 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i4AA8mln340536; Mon, 10 May 2004 20:08:48 +1000 (EST) Received: (from nathans@localhost) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id i4AA8lSd339737; Mon, 10 May 2004 20:08:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:08:47 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: Xavier Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS and mount /home quota problem mandrake 9.2 Message-ID: <20040510200847.A339754@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <409CCB74.8060002@free.fr> <20040509210706.GA15371@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1084172261.409f27e585723@imp6-q.free.fr> <20040510070912.GA30834@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1084177643.409f3ceb614b5@imp3-q.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1084177643.409f3ceb614b5@imp3-q.free.fr>; from x.poirier@free.fr on Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:27:23AM +0200 X-archive-position: 3082 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nathans@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 734 Lines: 24 On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:27:23AM +0200, Xavier wrote: > Selon Chris Wedgwood : > > > > > userx -- 25222M 25293M 27344M 26831 0 0 > > > > and this is the user than can exceed it's quota? > > Yes : userx can exced quota limits up to 25293M userx should be allowed to exceed 25293M here - that is the "soft" limit. It is the hard limit that one may not exceed, and after a period of time (default 7 days iirc), the soft limit becomes the hard limit - this is how all quota systems function, I believe; certainly XFS and the other filesystems on Linux behave this way. Can you show the repquota output when the user has exceeded the hard limit, or does that not happen? thanks. -- Nathan