Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from medoc.inf.ethz.ch (medoc.inf.ethz.ch [129.132.178.200])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i1GGnZKO012255
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:49:35 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by medoc.inf.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B6504DB3F; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:21:16 +0100 (MET)
Received: from medoc.inf.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (medoc [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 22263-01-3; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:21:16 +0100 (MET)
Received: by medoc.inf.ethz.ch (Postfix, from userid 42460)
	id 6D2C6DB3E; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:21:16 +0100 (MET)
Received: from 129.132.10.58
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user mschmitt)
        by www.mail.inf.ethz.ch with HTTP;
        Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:21:15 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <32995.129.132.10.58.1076948475.squirrel@www.mail.inf.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <32871.129.132.10.58.1076945932.squirrel@www.mail.inf.ethz.ch>
References: <1076941244.4030d1bc0eb22@www.mail.inf.ethz.ch>
    <32871.129.132.10.58.1076945932.squirrel@www.mail.inf.ethz.ch>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:21:15 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: XFS: Filesystem sd(8,50) has duplicate UUID - can't mount
From: mschmitt@inf.ethz.ch
To: mschmitt@inf.ethz.ch
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at inf.ethz.ch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id i1GGnkKO012256
X-archive-position: 2105
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: mschmitt@inf.ethz.ch
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-xfs

Well, the xfs_repair did not fix the problem. I'm running NFS/SMB now on
the fs mounted with -nouuid, I hope that's not a problem...
Will the error message in the subject go away with a reboot only?

Greetz
   Marc

> Any idea how to find out what could have been the problem? The xfs_repair
> (xfsprogs-2.6.2-0_7.rh7.3.at) is still running and will continue doing so
> for a while, I guess...