Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zok.sgi.com (zok.SGI.COM [204.94.215.101]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id h8J2BaFx020402 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:11:36 -0700 Received: from flecktone.americas.sgi.com (flecktone.americas.sgi.com [192.48.203.135]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP id h8J2BUq0022988 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:11:31 -0700 Received: from daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com (daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.214]) by flecktone.americas.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/generic_config-1.2) with ESMTP id h8J2BUcc11719504; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:11:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cf-vpn-sw-corp-64-44.corp.sgi.com [134.15.64.44]) by daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com (8.12.9/SGI-server-1.8) with ESMTP id h8J2BSRn290024425; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:11:29 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: xfssyncd syncing every five seconds? From: Steve Lord To: Simon Matter Cc: Nathan Scott , Jeremy Field , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <51664.213.173.165.140.1063926808.squirrel@imap01.ch.sauter-bc.com> References: <20030918020632.GA18362@wylde.fl.net.au> <20030918122113.A6939@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20030918025301.GA18791@wylde.fl.net.au> <20030918134329.B6939@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <51664.213.173.165.140.1063926808.squirrel@imap01.ch.sauter-bc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-11) Date: 18 Sep 2003 21:11:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1063937479.1811.19.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-archive-position: 448 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: lord@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 871 Lines: 25 On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 18:13, Simon Matter wrote: > > I just wanted to say 'me too'. And I can confirm that it's new with 1.3, I > have never seen this with any XFS version before. I have exactly the same > kernels with XFS 1.2 and 1.3 and it only happens with 1.3. > If you have a filesystem spread over lots of spindles, it sound a bit > scary, every 5 seconds. > > Simon > I could gripe about folks reporting this after the release, rather than before it... I just logged into my workstation from home, and watched it for a minute or two, zero I/O during this time. On the other hand, my laptop does appear to be doing periodic I/O and it does seem to be every 5 seconds. I have also had a report of someone not being able to keep their disks spun down in 2.6 on a laptop. Scratching my head so far, 5 seconds does not really tie up with any xfs thread. Steve