Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (law9-oe64.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.8.199]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.5) with SMTP id h7S7QlWZ026460 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:26:47 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:26:42 -0700 Received: from 80.128.32.149 by law9-oe64.law9.hotmail.com with DAV; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:26:42 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [80.128.32.149] X-Originating-Email: [k_leibrandt@hotmail.com] From: "Kai Leibrandt" To: "'Simon Matter'" , "'Axel Thimm'" Cc: "'Eric Sandeen'" , Subject: RE: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: <001601c36d35$b6957bd0$0c00a8c0@Legolas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2605 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1055.10.1.200.117.1062051046.squirrel@imap01.ch.sauter-bc.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2003 07:26:42.0400 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA5F2E00:01C36D35] X-archive-position: 215 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: k_leibrandt@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 506 Lines: 16 > Well, RH 7.2 is also widely used here and there is quite a > big difference between 7.2 ... 9. On 7.2, rpm is statically > linked. And then, if an application like rpm breaks with a > certain kernel/filesystem, I expect it not to be the only > application that breaks. Am I paranoid? > > Simon That's just what I was thinking; is rpm only an indication that other apps might have issues as well? If so, how do we identify them and rectify the problems? In the kernel, or in the app? Kai.