Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.arkeia.com (knox-gw.knox-software.easynet.fr [212.180.90.105]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5JF0U2x004610 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:00:32 -0700 Received: from vulcain.knox.com (vulcain.knox.com [192.168.7.145]) by mail1.arkeia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665441A175 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:00:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aym by vulcain.knox.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19T0tm-0000JI-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:00:26 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:00:26 +0200 From: Andre Majorel To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: ACLs on both ext2/ext3 and XFS Message-ID: <20030619150026.GA576@teaser.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4398 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: amajorel@teaser.fr Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs What's the wisdom on building a kernel with ACL support for both ext2/ext3 and XFS ? I tried applying patches in this order : linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2 ea-2.4.20-0.8.58.diff.gz acl-2.4.20-0.8.57.diff.gz nfsacl-2.4.20-0.8.59.diff.gz xfs-2.4.20-split-only.bz2 xfs-2.4.20-split-quota32.bz2 xfs-2.4.20-split-kernel.bz2 xfs-2.4.20-split-misc.bz2 xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2 It goes fine modulo a bunch of "(offset N lines)" messages but as soon as I reach xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2, problems appear ("Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?"). -- André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/