Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Tue, 20 May 2003 14:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chaos.egr.duke.edu (chaos.egr.duke.edu [152.3.195.82]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4KLXx2x031763 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:34:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (jlb@localhost) by chaos.egr.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4KLXNc15860; Tue, 20 May 2003 17:33:23 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: chaos.egr.duke.edu: jlb owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:33:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Joshua Baker-LePain X-X-Sender: jlb@chaos.egr.duke.edu To: Mako Furukawa cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS nfsd problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 4094 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: jlb17@duke.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 586 Lines: 16 On Tue, 20 May 2003 at 4:27pm, Mako Furukawa wrote > It seems as though we've been having problems with our filesystem server > ever since we went to XFS. Everytime we try doing anything large on it, > the kupdated seems to take a heavy load, and nfsd seems to freeze up on > us. Any ideas? We are using 2.4.18-4SGI_XFS_1.1smp. The first idea is to update -- that's awfully old. There are RH based kernels for the 1.2 release, and unofficial ones with the 1.2 XFS code and the latest RH errata kernel. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University