Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Fri, 23 May 2003 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.cnw.cz (bass.cnw.cz [193.85.207.202]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4NHIZ2x008257 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 10:18:37 -0700 Received: from ss2.cnw.cz ([147.32.120.95] helo=best.cnw.cz) by bass.cnw.cz with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com id 19JGBY-000748-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 19:18:40 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by best.cnw.cz with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com id 19JGAi-00053E-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 19:17:36 +0200 Subject: Question on weekly patch set From: "Ing. Milan Kocian" To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1053710256.17874.13.camel@best.cnw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 23 May 2003 19:17:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 4126 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: milan.kocian@cnw.cz Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 226 Lines: 12 Hello, why are now weekly generated patches four times longer then before? It is from May. It doesn't look like a patch for vanilla kernel. (2.4.20) Or did I miss something? Thanks for answer. Best regards Milan Kocian