Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Fri, 23 May 2003 13:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rj.sgi.com (rj.SGI.COM [192.82.208.96]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4NKWt2x012620 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 13:32:55 -0700 Received: from ledzep.americas.sgi.com (ledzep.americas.sgi.com [192.48.203.134]) by rj.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id h4NGXrE0028942 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 09:33:53 -0700 Received: from poppy-e236.americas.sgi.com (poppy-e236.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.207]) by ledzep.americas.sgi.com (8.12.9/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id h4NGXqa224450478; Fri, 23 May 2003 11:33:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from stout.americas.sgi.com (stout.americas.sgi.com [128.162.232.50]) by poppy-e236.americas.sgi.com (8.12.9/SGI-server-1.8) with ESMTP id h4NGXqYk10597628; Fri, 23 May 2003 11:33:52 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Tomorrow From: Eric Sandeen To: James Pearson Cc: Steve Lord , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <3ECE4AF9.F87E9600@moving-picture.com> References: <1053694002.2887.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1053697162.21472.51.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <3ECE4AF9.F87E9600@moving-picture.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1053707630.22683.13.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 23 May 2003 11:33:52 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 4131 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: sandeen@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 740 Lines: 26 How about "when it's ready?" ;-) We have a week off next week, so not much activity for a little while. But I would expect the first 1.3 prereleases to show up not too long after that, unless plans change. -Eric On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 11:23, James Pearson wrote: > Steve Lord wrote: > > In the next few months (deliberately vague since I don't have any > > firm dates), the following should show up: > > > > XFS 1.3 > > I know you have to be vague, but is it at all possible to give a better > guestimate for XFS 1.3 (or even a v1.2.1 that's been mentioned here > before)? > > Thanks > > James Pearson -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@sgi.com SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102