Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from shade.globe.cz (ondrej.sury.org [81.95.99.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h1DAsW3v026895 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:54:33 -0800 Received: (qmail 19267 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Feb 2003 11:01:08 -0000 To: Thomas Seifert Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Release 1.2 for Kernel 2.4.20? From: Ondrej Sury In-Reply-To: <20030212230557.3ece54af.thomas.seifert@myphorum.de> (Thomas Seifert's message of "Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:05:57 +0100") References: <20030212230557.3ece54af.thomas.seifert@myphorum.de> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:01:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87y94k78cr.fsf@globe.cz> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090011 (Oort Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 2658 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: sury.ondrej@globe.cz Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 788 Lines: 22 Thomas Seifert writes: > Hi folks, > > thanks for that great filesystem. > I use it in production on many system and never had any problems with it :-). > > For the current release, is there a chance to get official 1.2-patches for the 2.4.20-kernel > or maybe the upcoming 2.4.21? > > Or do we have to live with snapshots from CVS for it? > Just curious about the policy on it. Fixing rejected patches after patching 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and then with linux 2.4.20 patch is trivial (at least for ia32 arch), but it may or may not work. I just did it, but I am not courageous enough to try it ;-) O. -- Ondrej Sury - CIO Globe Internet s.r.o. http://globe.cz/ Tel: +420(2)35365000 Fax: +420(2)35365009 Planickova 1, 162 00 Praha 6