Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esds.vss.fsi.com (adsl-66-136-174-212.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net [66.136.174.212])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h0DHha3v017253
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:43:37 -0800
Received: from mosix (mosix [198.51.26.70])
	by esds.vss.fsi.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA23719
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:49:34 -0600 (CST)
Subject: XFS mount option
From: Matt Schillinger <mschilli@vss.fsi.com>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <3E1F4879.7090909@wgate.com>
References: <20030110091029.49057.qmail@web14808.mail.yahoo.com> 
	<3E1F4879.7090909@wgate.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 13 Jan 2003 11:50:40 -0600
Message-Id: <1042480241.12651.5.camel@mosix>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-archive-position: 2290
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: mschilli@vss.fsi.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-xfs
Content-Length: 183
Lines: 6

I have heard that xfs mounts will always ignore the mount option 'sync',
and mount asynchronously.. Is this true? Is there any danger in this?

Matt Schillinger
mschilli@vss.fsi.com