Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:46:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailbox.office.aol.com (x98A3A058.pix.aol.com [152.163.160.88]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id gB5IkruR031793 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:46:53 -0800 Received: from PCSN653911 (dhcp0-031-094.office.aol.com [10.0.31.94]) by mailbox.office.aol.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA08150; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:50:01 -0500 (EST) From: "N. Richard Solis" To: "Craig Tierney" Cc: Subject: RE: Clustered XFS? Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:49:16 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <20021205184653.GC16117@hpti.com> X-archive-position: 1965 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nrsolis@aol.net Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs So it's more like DAFS then? -----Original Message----- From: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com [mailto:linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com]On Behalf Of Craig Tierney Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:47 PM To: N. Richard Solis Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Clustered XFS? I have heard the term clustered NFS but I have never seen an actual implementation. In a clustered NFS solution, is every node actually talking SCSI (Fibre channel usually) to the disk? That is what CXFS is doing. Each node physically hits each disk. The metadata server keep track of what everyone is doing and prevents them from stomping on each other. Craig On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:54:30PM -0500, N. Richard Solis wrote: > Sounds more like a Clustered NFS solution to me? Would I be on target with > that one? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig Tierney [mailto:ctierney@hpti.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:41 PM > To: N. Richard Solis > Cc: 'Ray Muno '; 'Steve Lord '; linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com > Subject: Re: Clustered XFS? > > > The client provides the interface so that when a user does a read > or write, it translates the commands. The server takes care of the layout > and locking (if supported). Right now you can have a linux box access > the shared filesystem, but you still need an Irix box to take care of > the metadata and locking. > > I have not worked with CXFS, so I might have exact terminology wrong > but I think I have the idea right. > > Craig > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:22:31PM -0500, N. Richard Solis wrote: > > Client? Server? Please correct me if I'm wrong but should there be a > > distinction? My understanding of CXFS was that there were enhancements > made > > to XFS to cupport concurrent access to a storage pool via a SAN. To do > > this, you'd need locking/recovery, and some way to ensure that metadata > > changes were visible to all the servers that had the same filesystem > > mounted. Where does a client fit into all of this? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com > > [mailto:linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com]On Behalf Of Tierney, Craig > > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:59 AM > > To: 'Ray Muno '; 'Steve Lord ' > > Cc: 'N. Richard Solis '; 'linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com ' > > Subject: RE: Clustered XFS? > > > > > > > > SGI demoed the linux client at SC2002. The server though is still not > > ready. I think the person I talked to said 'in 6 months' but I could > > be off there. > > > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ray Muno > > To: Steve Lord > > Cc: N. Richard Solis; linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com > > Sent: 12/5/02 12:13 PM > > Subject: Re: Clustered XFS? > > > > The promise of a Linux client has been out there as long as CXFS has > > been > > around as far as I recall. When is it going to materialize? > > > > It has seemed strange to me that SGI can Support Solaris and Windows NT > > with this environment but Linux support has never been made available. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:50:47AM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 10:43, N. Richard Solis wrote: > > > > Is anyone working on adding clustering/SAN support to XFS on Linux? > > > > > > > > I was looking at the GFS software from Sistina and the OpenGFS > > project. I'm > > > > wondering if it's possible to merge the codebases of XFS and OpenGFS > > to > > > > provide the clustering functionality on XFS. Am I crazy? > > > > > > Go look for CXFS on SGI's home page. There will be something available > > > for Linux, but it will not be open source, and what parts of it are > > > available for hardware other than SGI's is under discussion. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 > > > Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@sgi.com > > > > > ======================================================================== > > ===== > > > > Ray Muno > > http://www.aem.umn.edu/people/staff/muno > > University of Minnesota e-mail: > > muno@aem.umn.edu > > Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics Phone: (612) > > 625-9531 > > 110 Union St. S.E. FAX: (612) > > 626-1558 > > Minneapolis, Mn 55455 > > > > ======================================================================== > > ===== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[HTML alternate version deleted]] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Craig Tierney (ctierney@hpti.com) > > > -- Craig Tierney (ctierney@hpti.com)