Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:59:22 +0100
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: fwd: 1.2pre2 and XFS_VERSION_STRING
Message-ID: <20021112115922.GA7985@bonzo.nirvana>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gatW/ieO32f1wygP"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

--gatW/ieO32f1wygP
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The following mail bounced due to
>   linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
>     Connection timed out:
>     SMTP timeout while connected to oss.sgi.com [128.167.58.27] after end=
 of
>     data (1803 bytes written):
>     retry timeout exceeded

Are those points still valid in 1.2pre3?
--=20
Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <thimm@puariko.homeip.net>
Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84])
	by up.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA659821
	for <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:33:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fwd10.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 189MYX-0008P7-07; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:33:01 +0100
Received: from puariko.homeip.net (520039812576-0001@[217.231.219.18]) by fmrl10.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 189MYQ-18Xrv6C; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:32:54 +0100
Received: (from thimm@localhost)
	by bonzo.nirvana (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gA69WqlO006363;
	Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:32:52 +0100
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:32:51 +0100
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: 1.2pre2 and XFS_VERSION_STRING
Message-ID: <20021106093251.GA5009@bonzo.nirvana>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Sender: 520039812576-0001@t-dialin.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0
	tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,AWL
	version=2.31
X-Spam-Level: 

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

1.2pre2 sets the version string as if it were pre1:
fs/xfs/linux/xfs_version.h:#define XFS_VERSION_STRING "SGI XFS 1.2pre1"
whereas 1.2pre1 did use the CVS date:
fs/xfs/linux/xfs_version.h:#define XFS_VERSION_STRING "CVS-09/19/02:05"

Personally I very much liked the date format. For instance I wanted to know
whether the "problem with minimal acls on linux"-fix was part of it (it
isn't).

What CVS date is 1.2pre2 based on?
--=20
Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9yOHDQBVS1GOamfERAhSJAJ40pPiTBxzVntiT3isCjOSfrhJ8egCfXj9e
XPlubmQ2LtdEGFoSqn6P4Kc=
=B4Bq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--

--gatW/ieO32f1wygP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE90O0aQBVS1GOamfERAuuzAJ4qpClBqoFTeCEYMwPpHz1wZXU/AwCgksvZ
3u4CW5F1bnw3UEZB/qCtVhE=
=IgWT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gatW/ieO32f1wygP--