Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeus-e8.americas.sgi.com ([198.149.7.250]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g8PM3UtG012988 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:03:30 -0700 Received: from poppy-e185.americas.sgi.com (poppy-e185.americas.sgi.com [128.162.185.207]) by zeus-e8.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id RAA10384; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:03:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from stout.americas.sgi.com (stout.americas.sgi.com [128.162.187.5]) by poppy-e185.americas.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/SGI-server-1.8) with ESMTP id RAA92605; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:03:24 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Question about litte and Big Endian? From: Eric Sandeen To: Steve Lord Cc: gmrincon@att.net, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, grincon@att.net In-Reply-To: <1032990726.23748.555.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> References: <20020925205152.MZWD29048.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@mtiwebc19> <1032990726.23748.555.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 25 Sep 2002 17:03:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1032991393.31876.17.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-archive-position: 588 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: sandeen@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs And if this all works, send in some benchmarks, to see if it's all worthwhile. :) -Eric On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 16:52, Steve Lord wrote: > you probably need to tweak that. There are a number of other places in > the xfs code which depend on the value of __BYTE_ORDER, you might try > changing that instead of doing what you did. > > Steve -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@sgi.com SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102