Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6HIFVRw028815 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:15:31 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g6HIFVB6028814 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:15:31 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from cogent.jatosoft.com ([216.170.207.51]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6HIFIRw028785 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:15:23 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [216.170.207.50]) by cogent.jatosoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27EB8004E2 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:04:27 -0500 (CDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:20:12 -0500 Subject: Software RAID, a bit OT From: Ben Gollmer To: XFS Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Hi storage gurus! Hope you don't mind me asking this on-list, but I've gotten some very helpful storage-related info from here in the past. I'm putting together a server for a small group of developers; we have no real budget, so we're trying to keep things cheap. Here's our hardware specs so far: 2x P3 700 MHz 512 MB RAM 2 Promise PCI ATA-133 controllers 3 Seagate 80 GB HDDs This server is going to handle file sharing, e-mail, CVS, and a bug-tracking database for us. Our project has some rather large files so we need a good amount of storage space. I was planning to software RAID 5 the HDDs together for a total of 160 GBs. I have been enjoying XFS on my workstation but I know it has had problems with software RAID 5 in the past. Are these problems fixed now? We also considered trying to grab another 80 GB drive from somewhere and do a RAID 0+1 (still giving us 160 GBs storage) but I don't know if Linux software RAID handles this well. Most of us run the -aa kernel tree on our workstations but I have no problem running SGI CVS kernels on the server if they are reasonably stable. Any input would be much appreciated :) Ben