Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:04:19 -0600
From: pac@fortuitous.com
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?
Message-ID: <20020319020419.GA19296@bistro.marx>
Reply-To: pac@fortuitous.com
References: <15510.28824.127449.355731@jdc.local> <1016493118.7723.59.camel@UberGeek>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1016493118.7723.59.camel@UberGeek>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:11:58PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> Ahh..yes...openAFS. I should've thought about that one. Then you could
> user kerberos too! :) 
> 
> On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 16:56, Jason White wrote:
> > pac@fortuitous.com writes:
> >  >   
> >  >   Anyone use or care about:
> >  > 
> >  >  a. Coda
> >  >  b. Intermezzo
> > 
> > Why not consider
> > c. OpenAFS (http://www.openafs.org/) which I have never used, but
> > apparently it works (or at least used to work/has been rumored to
> > work) with XFS as the underlying file system on the AFS partitions.

  I'll consider it. But that still leaves us where we started. 
Has anyone Used any of these, and why are there so many projects
working independently of each other, and which is the most reliable?

-Phil Carinhas
--
 .--------------------------------------------------------.
 | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas       | pac@fortuitous.com      |
 | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com   |
 | Linux Consulting & Training  | Tel : 1-512-467-2154    |
 `--------------------------------------------------------'