Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:06:02 +1100
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>, Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: New VFS quota (was Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch)
Message-ID: <20020228110602.I193798@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0202262118500.1294-100000@coredump.sh0n.net> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0202262235340.1608-100000@coredump.sh0n.net> <20020227144011.C193798@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20020227174116.B944@caldera.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020227174116.B944@caldera.de>; from hch@caldera.de on Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:41:16PM +0100
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:41:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:40:11PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:36:02PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm told there's a suse patch with XFS + quota?
> > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel
> > > 
> > > Im going to try this one out.
> > > Shawn.
> > > 
> > 
> > Ah - I didn't realise this was online somewhere.  Yes, that should
> > work - Hubert (Mantel), Jan and I were discussing this last week and
> > he reported good success (showed me his merge & it looked fine).
> 
> What about just including new-quota in the XFS tree?
> 

I'm very tempted - I'll discuss with the rest of the folk here,
IMO this is the right thing to do at this stage.

Would anyone out there have a problem if we did this?  It sounds
like it will make life alot easier for alot of people.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan