Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g110HBx14431 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:17:11 -0800 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g110H7d14407 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:17:07 -0800 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via SMTP id PAA09310 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:12:40 -0800 (PST) mail_from (nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com) Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA25638; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:15:46 +1100 Received: (from nathans@localhost) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA84390; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:15:46 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:15:45 +1100 From: Nathan Scott To: "D. Stimits" Cc: "XFS: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" Subject: Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes Message-ID: <20020201101545.G88469@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20020201095217.F88469@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <3C59CE74.E5D20B9D@idcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C59CE74.E5D20B9D@idcomm.com>; from stimits@idcomm.com on Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:08:36PM -0700 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Status: O Content-Length: 729 Lines: 20 On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:08:36PM -0700, D. Stimits wrote: > Nathan Scott wrote: > > > > >From an end-user point of view, we will need to make a transition > > from using our current system call interfaces for EAs and ACLs to > > the new interfaces. This affects both the kernel and a number of > > the userspace tools and libraries. We've considered attempting to > > Do I read this correctly, it appears that only tools and kernels change, > current XFS filesystems themselves will remain unchanged for this > purpose, and fully compatible with newer tools and kernels? Yes, the ondisk formats remain unchanged, incl. the ondisk ACL format (which is also the same as the IRIX/XFS Posix ACL format). cheers. -- Nathan