Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g0V0Dq328882 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:13:52 -0800 Received: from pizda.ninka.net (IDENT:root@pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0V0Dnd28859 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:13:49 -0800 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25333; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:12:17 -0800 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:12:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020130.151217.102576862.davem@redhat.com> To: kaos@sgi.com Cc: a.gruenbacher@computer.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: extended attributes interface From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <5366.1012432255@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20020130.144647.21928212.davem@redhat.com> <5366.1012432255@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Status: O Content-Length: 389 Lines: 12 From: Keith Owens Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:10:55 +1100 Sparc64 and mips64 are a problem as long as the kernel is 64 bit and userspace is 32 bit. Read this as: forever. Because we have several years worth of users with 32-bit userland distributions on at least sparc64. These people (including me, I have to test it :-) are not going away any time soon.