Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g0TLiaB28176 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:44:36 -0800 Received: from yog-sothoth.sgi.com (eugate.sgi.com [192.48.160.10]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0TLiTd28154 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:44:29 -0800 Received: from zeus-e8.americas.sgi.com (zeus-e8.americas.sgi.com [128.162.8.103]) by yog-sothoth.sgi.com (980305.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam-europe) via ESMTP id VAA14056 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:42:40 +0100 (CET) mail_from (lord@sgi.com) Received: from daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com [128.162.185.214]) by zeus-e8.americas.sgi.com (8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id OAA197360; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:43:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com (jen.americas.sgi.com [128.162.187.49]) by daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/SGI-server-1.7) with ESMTP id OAA96541; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:43:08 -0600 (CST) Received: by jen.americas.sgi.com (8.11.6/SGI-client-1.7) id g0TKfAt26423; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:41:10 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c From: Steve Lord To: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" Cc: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 29 Jan 2002 14:41:10 -0600 Message-Id: <1012336870.26363.14.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Status: O Content-Length: 1568 Lines: 41 On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 14:28, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:09:17 -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > > [...] > >XFS has two directory formats, V1 directories were the original, V2 was > >a new version written to fix problems with NFS and a few other apps. > >Linux always uses V2, the V1 is there for Irix compatibility - but it > >can get into loops or miss entries in readdir on linux. > > So with Andi's patch one should NOT enable V1 directories, or otherwise the XFS > code can't read existing V2 filesystems anymore? Is that right? Noooo, I think you got your 1s and 2s crossed in there. Andi was turning off the backwards compatibility with old irix filesystems (V1) in the patch. It is not exactly a huge win spacewise, but every little helps. This will not affect any existing filesystem made on linux since they all use the V2 code. Right now we are not sure Andi's patch really works for removal of the directory code, since the file he is removing contains functions which are called from V2 code. I would hold off using any of this stuff until we have sorted it all out. Steve > > Thanks. > > > -- > Verkaufe Original-BMW-Raeder: L I N U X .~. > http://adsl-bergs.rz.rwth-aachen.de/~rabe The Choice /V\ > of a GNU /( )\ > Generation ^^-^^ > -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@sgi.com