Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g03GkGf21167 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:46:16 -0800 Received: from rj.sgi.com (rj.sgi.com [204.94.215.100]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g03GkCg21145 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:46:12 -0800 Received: from zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com [128.162.8.103]) by rj.sgi.com (8.11.4/8.11.4/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP id g03Fk5Y26507 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:46:05 -0800 Received: from daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com [128.162.185.214]) by zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id JAA3984575; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:44:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com (jen.americas.sgi.com [128.162.187.49]) by daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/SGI-server-1.7) with ESMTP id JAA08506; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:44:49 -0600 (CST) Received: by jen.americas.sgi.com (8.11.6/SGI-client-1.7) id g03Fdgc12141; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:39:42 -0600 Subject: Re: file corruption during emacs build on XFS logical volume From: Steve Lord To: Steve Lord Cc: Sean Neakums , Linux XFS In-Reply-To: <1010069377.23328.15.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> References: <6u4rm4r53e.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1009995505.14223.9.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <6uy9jgpn2x.fsf@zork.zork.net> <6uu1u4pf48.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1010013019.1281.6.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <6upu4spccv.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1010013997.1315.11.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <6ulmfgpau5.fsf@zork.zork.net> <6uheq4p9ny.fsf@zork.zork.net> <3C33AF81.AC235AD0@idcomm.com> <6ubsgbq013.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1010069377.23328.15.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Jan 2002 09:39:42 -0600 Message-Id: <1010072382.23328.38.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Status: O Content-Length: 802 Lines: 23 On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 08:49, Steve Lord wrote: > > Since I am building on a redhat based box, I am doing rpm builds not > debian package builds, and the rpm version which appears friendly to > this box is emacs-20 not emacs-21. Having said that, emacs is building > OK for me here. It is difficult to tell if the problem you are seeing > is in the true emacs build, or in the package generation. Can you tell, > if it is the package generation then the rpm build is not a valid test > case here. > Following up to myself, dropping the system memory to 128M seems to have triggered the problem here, so yes there does seem to be an XFS bug here. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@sgi.com