Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fBRIUTl26695 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:30:29 -0800 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id fBRIUQX26668 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:30:26 -0800 Received: from relay1.corp.sgi.com (spindle.corp.sgi.com [198.29.75.13]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id JAA02082 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:30:50 -0800 (PST) mail_from (sandeen@sgi.com) Received: from liberator (sshgate.corp.sgi.com [169.238.216.146]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA54003; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:29:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: XFS dying when many processes copy many files/directories From: Eric Sandeen To: cradeke Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <3C2B1350.D2074E68@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> References: <3C2B1350.D2074E68@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 27 Dec 2001 11:28:25 -0600 Message-Id: <1009474106.21791.10.camel@Liberator> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2001-12-27 at 06:25, cradeke wrote: > Your simple test shows that there is a real problem > with > xfs which should be solved quickly. After such a kupdated amok running > opened > files are filled with @'s and any change or creation of new files are > lost. These are probably only slightly related; if xfs gets wedged such that it can't flush file data to disk, then your "@" problem is the same as what is explained in the FAQ. You're just shutting off the computer before data is committed. The root problem is whatever is causing xfs to get hung up. Many of these issues were solved recently; you should try a cvs snapshot to see if your problem goes away. We'll try Adrian's test when we get back to work after the break. -Eric