Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f8591XP17190 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 02:01:33 -0700 Received: from mail.loewe-komp.de (mail.loewe-komp.de [62.156.155.230]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f8591Td17171 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 02:01:29 -0700 Received: from loewe-komp.de (pippin.loewe-komp.de [192.168.169.19]) by mail.loewe-komp.de (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id f8597wU30966; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:08:02 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.loewe-komp.de: Host pippin.loewe-komp.de [192.168.169.19] claimed to be loewe-komp.de Message-ID: <3B95EA01.15350CE@loewe-komp.de> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:01:53 +0200 From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=E4chtler?= Organization: LOEWE. Hannover X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-ac3 i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Seth Mos CC: XFS mailing list Subject: Re: System lock while accessing files causes file corruption References: <3B94F726.E978C299@sgi.com> <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A888526@AUSMAIL> <3B94F726.E978C299@sgi.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010904193203.032499a0@pop.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Seth Mos wrote: > > At 17:57 4-9-2001 +0200, utz lehmann wrote: > >Hi Eric > > > >Eric Sandeen [sandeen@sgi.com] wrote: > > > But in any case, it occurred to me that you could make /etc on it's own > > > partition, and mount that O_SYNC - I don't think that would be too much > > > overhead, /etc doesn't get written that much on a normal system (?). If > > > Oracle puts config files elsewhere, you could simlink them onto this > > > filesystem. > > > >You can't make /etc on a different partition than /. > >/etc, /sbin, /dev (without devfs) must on the / partition otherwise your > >system will not boot. > > If you use a decent layout fopr your data it does not matter. > If you have a separate /usr /var /tmp /home like most servers do you could > just mount your / fs O_SYNC since it would only have a _very_ slight > performance loss since you almost never write to the root fs. :-) > What about the access time? If you mount your / with sync,noatime then it only gets changed when users are logging in (chown user.group /dev/pty and alike). But yes, it's still acceptable ;)