Received: (from mail@localhost) by linux-xfs.sgi.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f595B6hu024204 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 22:11:06 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: linux-xfs.sgi.com: mail set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from yog-sothoth.sgi.com (eugate.sgi.com [192.48.160.10]) by linux-xfs.sgi.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f595B33D024197 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 22:11:04 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by yog-sothoth.sgi.com (980305.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam-europe) via SMTP id HAA1498124 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 07:11:00 +0200 (CEST) mail_from (ivanr@melbourne.sgi.com) Received: from omen.melbourne.sgi.com (omen.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.139]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA08612; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:09:39 +1000 From: ivanr@melbourne.sgi.com (Ivan Rayner) Received: from localhost (ivanr@localhost) by omen.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA89896; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:09:38 +1000 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: omen.melbourne.sgi.com: ivanr owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:09:37 +1000 To: Russel Ingram cc: Subject: Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Russel Ingram wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Ivan Rayner wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Russel Ingram wrote: > > > > > I'm using xfsdump from cvs (I think it is from 5/30/01 but might be > > > 6/5/01) to attempt to backup an xfs filesystem to an HP Colorado 8GBe > > > parallel tape drive. Every time I try to use the -m option (the > > > parallel tape driver is a very minimal tape device driver and suggests > > > specifying 16k as the block size) xfsdump core dumps with the following > > > error: > > > > > > drive_minrmt.c:1820: do_get_write_buf: Assertion 'contextp->dc_nextp < > > > contextp->dc_recendp' failed. > > > > > > Is this a bug or just an incompatiblity with the minimalness of the pt > > > driver? > > > > If you can mail the complete xfsdump command line, I'll see if I can > > reproduce the problem here. > > > okie dokie, here's what I was giving it: > > xfsdump -m -b 16 -o -l0 -E -F -M"gumby" -L"home" -s home -f /dev/pt/0 / > > Like I said its a parallel tape drive that I haven't got anything else to > work with either (tar works but not to the expected capacity) so it may > just be a problem in the device driver but since it core dumps without > even trying to dump I thought someone might be interested in if it turned > out to be a bug with xfsdump. The argument to -b should be bytes, so 16k would be 16384 not 16. If this doesn't fix your problem, could you use -v5 to get verbose output. (This might produce alot of output, so you should redirect it to a file.) Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@melbourne.sgi.com