Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f5SLOqA17743
	for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:24:52 -0700
Received: from porgy.srv.nld.sonera.net (mbox-01.soneraplaza.nl [195.66.15.137])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5SLOnV17740
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:24:50 -0700
Received: from qn-212-58-167-113.quicknet.nl ([212.58.167.113]:62698 "EHLO
        auto-nb1.xs4all.nl") by soneramail.nl with ESMTP id <S87335AbRF1VYx>;
	Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:24:53 +0200
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010628232151.02ee7890@pop.xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: knuffie@pop.xs4all.nl
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:24:26 +0200
To: Florin Andrei <florin@sgi.com>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: upgrade
In-Reply-To: <993761458.32474.20.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

At 13:50 28-6-2001 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
>Do you think it's ok to upgrade a system installed from Release-1.0 with
>the kernel RPMs from PR3?

Yes, this is the only change for 1.0.1. I don't know about the stability of 
the 2.4.3 based kernel but I am using 2.4.5 or later based kernels for my 
production  machines. I probably got hit by lightning or something to think 
that they are better.

Cheers

--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.