Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f5SBSVH01457 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:28:31 -0700 Received: from mail.coltex.nl (IDENT:root@edge.coltex.nl [194.151.97.115]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5SBSTV01448 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:28:30 -0700 Received: from auto-nb1.xs4all.nl (auto-nb1.coltex.nl [10.0.1.171]) by mail.coltex.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5SBSPH11802; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:28:25 +0200 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010628132706.02f35300@pop.xs4all.nl> X-Sender: knuffie@pop.xs4all.nl (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:28:18 +0200 To: oe.hansen@gamma.telenordia.se, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com From: Seth Mos Subject: Re: Page buffering, side effects? In-Reply-To: <01062812554001.01258@citadel.oehansen.pp.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk At 12:55 28-6-2001 +0200, Orn E. Hansen wrote: > Are there any known issues to page buffering, like slow throughput on ppp >lines? It is only used for disk buffering. Not for the PPP code. I have a adsl line which runs through a ppp deamon and I am managing a 100KB/s roughly 1Mbit downstream. So I would say, no. Bye -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind.