Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f5UFKSp07708
	for linux-xfs-outgoing; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:20:28 -0700
Received: from gatekeeper.slim (slimnet.xs4all.nl [194.109.194.192])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5UFKPV07705
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:20:25 -0700
Received: from inter.nl.net (paragon.slim [192.168.100.26])
	by gatekeeper.slim (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f5UEn6f08684;
	Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:49:06 +0200
Message-ID: <3B3DEF84.D2CC1B15@inter.nl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:25:56 +0200
From: Jurgen Kramer <GTM.Kramer@inter.nl.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>
CC: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Filesystem on XFS partition no longer accessible afterwriting 
 (problem solved)
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010630154857.03910850@pop.xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

After getting the system back up online I checked the Makefile. It defaults
to using gcc which
is not a problem with RH7.1. After changing it back to kgcc and recompiling
the kernel it works
like a charm again. So confusing two different systems...;-).

So there are no problems with XFS just the usual RH gcc stuff...


Cheers,

Jurgen



Seth Mos wrote:

> At 15:47 30-6-2001 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm having problems with my XFS partition on one of my systems. The
> >partition contains all my MP3 files. This morning I was trying to add a
> >new album to my collection but as soon as something is written to this
> >filesystem it's no longer accessible. The program who's accessing the
> >partition starts to eat up all CPU time (one one processor) and can't be
> >
> >killed. A hard reset is the only solution.
>
> Are there any messages on the console or in the log. Is it just one
> partition you can't write to?
> Do you have problems writing or reading from other applications?
> Can you give some statistics about your system and disk configuration?
> Any used hdpram parameters or mount options?
>
> >After upgrading to the latest CVS version the problem still persists.
> >What could be the problem?
> >I'm running this on a Red Hat 7.0 SMP system. It all worked all some CVS
> >
> >versions ago...;-)
>
> It still should work. Can you replicate this with an older kernel?
> And what kernel are you running now?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Seth
> Every program has two purposes one for which
> it was written and another for which it wasn't
> I use the last kind.