Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f5TLD3219338 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:13:03 -0700 Received: from relay.xlink.net (relay.xlink.net [193.141.40.4]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5TLD1V19334 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:13:01 -0700 Received: from lizard.webland.de (lizard.webland.de [194.122.76.201]) by relay.xlink.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07892; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:13:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lizard.webland.de (8.8.8/8.8.7) id XAA20363; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:12:58 +0200 (MET DST) >Received: from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C98857306; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ch.sauter-bc.com (ppp01.cad.sba [10.1.249.1]) by mobile.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5110C25835; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:30:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B3CEF07.479A0857@ch.sauter-bc.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:11:35 +0200 From: Simon Matter X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.7 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: J Landman Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Problem fixed (I think) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id f5TLD2V19336 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk J Landman schrieb: > Folks: > > I had some problems with xfs that I think I fixed. Basically I had > cp/mv and others core dump rather than work. What I did is I backed up my Can you let me know on how many disks your filesystem was. And was it IDE or SCSI. If IDE, what kind of chip and what kind of settings? > > xfs based data, rebuilt the raido, rebuilt the filesystem, and it now Ah, RAID 0, so you have more than one disk? IDE? with DMA (enabled for most chipsets by default in the RH7.1-XFS kernel? > seems to work properly. No core dumps. > > I had built the original file system with the RedHat 7.1 iso based > images, and tools. I changed distros to Mandrake. Thats when it broke. What kernel did you use when it broke? Are you shure you know exactly when it broke? > > So, using plain old 2.4.5 + patches under Mandrake, it is running fine > (afte rthe little backup bit above). > > > During this time, I was unable to build the development tree (same > crashes that everyone else was getting, using wither the 2.91.66 or the > 2.96.3 compilers). I was also unable to apply the patches to a 2.4.5-5mdk > Mandrake source tree. Got lots of rej's. I am hoping that the work to Did you check filesystem consistency somehow? For ex. with rpm -Va which will show all changes in the distribution file? > > get it into the kernel accelerates, so we wont have the problems in the > not too distant future. > > Regardless of the minor annoyances, good work folks! > > -- > Joe Landman, > landman@mediaone.net I was suffering filesystem corruption for awhile now and it was very difficult to reproduce it. In my case it is not XFS or Raid related but has something to do with the IDE subsystem. Simon